Today I’m excited to share a quick interview I recently did with Robert dos Remedios (Coach Dos).

For those of you that don’t know Coach Dos, he is one of only 100 Master Strength & Conditioning Coach in the world recognized by the Collegiate Strength and Conditioning Coaches Association (CSCCa), a Nike Elite Performance Coach and was the 2006 NSCA Strength Coach of the Year. He’s also co-authored Men’s Health’s Power Training, Men’s Health’s Cardio Strength Training, and Men’s Health’s Total Fitness Guide.

I’ve read a lot of his work over the years and had an opportunity to hear him speak at a Perform Better Summit a few years back. It’s difficult to summarize his body of work into a single sentence, but if I had to try, I’d say he specializes in designing programs to get incredible results with large volumes of athletes.

This is one of the reasons why I was so excited to review his new program, Complete Program Design, which was officially released this morning. As is always the case with new product launches, they’re offering a crazy discount during the launch week (ends Friday at midnight EST). If you’re interested in writing more effective programs, I highly recommend checking it out.

Coach Dos-Complete Program Design

Click here to grab your copy >> Complete Program Design

In the interview, Coach Dos answers a few questions I had for him after reviewing his program about the importance of having a complete program, core training, and making program design more efficient. Enjoy!

KN: Not everyone has a goal of “wanting to improve everything.” Can you talk about how a “complete program” is still necessary even if someone just wants to improve one quality, like speed?

CD: One of the biggest requests I get from athletes and parents etc. is “I want to get faster….what do I do?” Most of the time they are looking for speed drills. The biggest misconception is that we can just dial that speed training in and that’s all it will take to reach that goal. Sure speed drills are great, but getting stronger and building power will ultimately make you faster. This is where having a complete training system will always be superior to cherry picking drills for a specific goal. We always need to keep an eye on the BIG picture. In this case, the combination of strength, power, and speed training will deliver better results.

KN: That’s a great point, and something I hear of a lot from athletes. There’s a lot more to speed training than just running sprints!

I really like how you broke down your core training into simple categories to make programming more efficient. Can you give an example of how your core exercises transfer to sport performance?   

CD: We break down our core into 2 sub-categories: What I call “Pillar” or “anti-extension exercises” and “Rotational/anti-rotational exercises.” When we address both categories we create a complete core, one that is not only strong and functional, but much more resistant to injury. I think of an exercise like a TRX or a superband pallof press as essential to performance as it requires the body to resist rotational forces; this is key in any sort of contact or collision sport as it helps us decelerate forces which can help in reactive performance and injury prevention.

KN: Last year I invested a significant amount of time (and money) in getting better with excel to make our data collection, test reporting and program design more efficient and professional looking.

Your “program maker” file is AWESOME. It looks like it took a lot of time to put together, but probably saves you a lot of time now. Can you talk about the benefits of having a system like this to design programs?

CD: I’m not an excel expert so I had to outsource the development of the cards. That being said I think these are the ‘x-factor’ in this program. Not only does it save time, it takes the guesswork out of building workouts. It’s almost impossible to accidentally miss a movement pattern that needs to be trained and it keeps you honest in terms of avoiding exercises you many not like, but we know you should be doing.

These cards will literally change the way you attack your program design.

KN: I agree. With the drop-down menus, you can literally create goal-specific training programs in a few minutes.

Thanks for doing a quick interview!

Coach Dos-Complete Program Design-Family

Click here to grab your copy >> Complete Program Design

To your success,

Kevin Neeld
HockeyTransformation.com
OptimizingMovement.com
UltimateHockeyTraining.com

Please enter your first name and email below to sign up for my FREE Athletic Development and Hockey Training Newsletter!

Last Friday we wrapped up post-Summer testing with one of our college guys and one of our pro guys, as it’s time for them to return back to their teams.

Endeavor Banner
Today I wanted to dive into the program of the pro player to illustrate the types of results that can be achieved with individualized programming, even in a very-well trained athlete. In this case, the player had just graduated from college and signed with an AHL team at the end of the year.

A few notes from his intake assessment (6/17/15):

Movement Assessments

  1. Hip Extension: Limited bilaterally
  2. Hip Adduction: Limited bilaterally
  3. Hip Abduction: Limited on R
  4. Left Hip External Rotation: 24; Internal Rotation: 24; 48 total
  5. Right Hip External Rotation: 24; Internal Rotation: 22; 46 total
  6. Shoulder Horizontal Abduction: Limited bilaterally
  7. Shoulder Flexion: Limited bilaterally
  8. Left Y-Balance Posteromedial Reach: 102cm; Posterolateral Reach: 94cm
  9. Right Y-Balance Posteromedial Reach: 99; Posterolateral Reach: 97cm

Performance Assessments

  1. VJ: 31”
  2. Lateral Bound: Average of 87.5”
  3. 1-Leg DB Goblet Squat: 100×5
  4. Bench Press: 185×6
  5. Chin-Ups: 237×5 (192 body weight + 45lbs external load)
  6. *We did a repeat shuttle test, but we didn’t retest at the end of the Summer, so I didn’t include it here.

Post-Summer Assessment (9/4/15):

Movement Assessments

  1. Hip Extension: Unlimited bilaterally
  2. Hip Adduction: Unlimited bilaterally
  3. Hip Abduction: Unlimited bilaterally
  4. Left Hip External Rotation: 30 (+6); Internal Rotation: 31 (+7); 61 total (+13)
  5. Right Hip External Rotation: 31 (+7); Internal Rotation: 31 (+9); 62 total (+16)
  6. Shoulder Horizontal Abduction: Unlimited bilaterally
  7. Shoulder Flexion: Unlimited bilaterally
  8. Left Y-Balance Posteromedial Reach: 113cm (+11); Posterolateral Reach: 98cm (+4)
  9. Right Y-Balance Posteromedial Reach: 116 (+17); Posterolateral Reach: 108cm (+11)

Performance Assessments

  1. VJ: 35” (+4”)
  2. Lateral Bound: Average of 91” (+3.5“)
  3. 1-Leg DB Goblet Squat: 125 for 2 sets of 5 during training
  4. Bench Press: 225 for 2 sets of 3 in training
  5. Chin-Ups: 237 for 3 sets of 5 in training (192 body weight + 45lbs external load)

Overall, I was very pleased with the results of his program. Below is a birds-eye view of the programming strategy we took with him.

This progression is one I use with a lot of our higher level hockey players in the off-season, but where we start (e.g. how much time and how we go about developing the aerobic system) and exercise selection is always based on my individual assessment of the player.

Looking at the structure of his program:

  1. Total Training Time: 12 Weeks, 5 Days/Week
  2. Days 1, 3, & 5 are developmental days; Days 2&4 are aerobic or recovery days
  3. Day 1 typically has a lower body emphasis; Day 3 an upper body emphasis, and Day 5 a full body emphasis

Phase 1: 3 Weeks

  1. Movement Restoration: Teach posterior pelvic tilt OUT of anterior pelvic tilt with stabilization strategies to control it
  2. Exercise Selection: Primarily unilateral lower and upper body patterns as a result of significant bilateral limitations
  3. Phase Emphasis: Deceleration and eccentric strength
  4. Energy Systems: Primarily aerobic with an emphasis on improving aerobic abilities of fast twitch muscle fibers

Phase 2: 3 Weeks

  1. Movement Restoration: “Untwist” pelvis by restoring L adduction and R abduction with remedial stabilization strategies to control it
  2. Exercise Selection: Continued with unilateral lower and upper body patterns, but introduced Chin-Ups and Trap Bar Deadlifts (despite not doing them in 1st phase, he hit 415 for a triple in Week 3)
  3. Phase Emphasis: Concentric strength/power
  4. Energy Systems: Combination of alactic power and aerobic work

Phase 3: 4 Weeks

  1. Movement Restoration: Progress exercises to more challenging variations with same stabilization intent, while integrating multiple strategies into a single exercise (e.g. L adduction control, abdominal integration and R abduction movement)
  2. Exercise Selection: Primarily unilateral lower and upper body patterns, but introduced/kept more bilateral movements (e.g. bench press, chin-ups, trap bar deadlifts)
  3. Phase Emphasis: Significantly increased volume of sprint work; Lifting transitioned into French Contrast Training 2x/week with heavy emphasis on speed of movement across all three developmental days.
  4. Energy Systems: Alactic power and capacity work, with tempo or max aerobic speed work in between

Phase 4: 2 Weeks

  1. Movement Restoration: Integrate acquired stability into reciprocal movement patterns
  2. Exercise Selection: Mix of unilateral and bilateral lifts
  3. Phase Emphasis: Maintain speed and strength while targeting improved lactic capacity
  4. Energy Systems: Decreased volume of alactic capacity work; heavy emphasis on lactic capacity work

Movement Restoration

One interesting thing to point out about the “movement restoration” process is that the improvements in more isolated hip motions (e.g. Hip extension, adduction, abduction, external and internal rotation) were mirrored by improvements in the integrated patterns (e.g. Y-Balance Posteromedial and Posterolateral Reach distances).

For those that aren’t familiar with the Y-Balance Test, the Posteromedial Reach pattern pretty closely resembles a forward skating stride, and the Posterolateral Reach pattern is reasonably close to a cross-over pattern.

Y-Balance PL

Y-Balance Posteromedial Reach Pattern

These are the best proxies we have for assessing stride length potential off the ice, and the measures can be displayed visually to help illustrate asymmetries.

Stride Profiles

Can you pick out the player recovering from an MCL sprain?

This provides some validation for the approach of stripping down global movement limitations (e.g. a short right stride length) to their most fundamental parts (e.g. limited Right Hip Abduction and External Rotation) and addressing those. Further validating this approach via on-ice tests is one area I hope to pursue through my doctorate research.

Unconventional Aerobic Training

From a conditioning standpoint, aerobic training has experienced a return to the spotlight over the last few years, but many still have the believe that aerobic training is only characterized by long-duration steady state work. In this player’s program, he did cardiac output work (which is characterized by long-duration steady stay work) 4 days, total, over the course of his 12 weeks. The rest of his “aerobic” conditioning work involved pushing sleds, continuous jumping, tempo runs/slideboards, and airdyne rides, none of which really looks like aerobic training. I think this approach is one of the reasons why his power measures increased so much and why he ran a 1.51 10-yard sprint (measured with photocell start and finish) at the end of the Summer.

Lactic Work Last Priority

Building on the aerobic discussion, one thing that may stand out to those with a background in hockey is how little lactic work we did. I don’t have post-Summer conditioning numbers for him, but more important than those, he said he feels great on the ice. There are a few reasons for minimizing lactic work.

  1. The best forwards accumulate around 20 minutes of playing time across 3 hours. Average shifts are in the 45-second range, with several minutes of rest between shifts. There is definitely a lactic component in the game of hockey, but it’s important to watch what the players actually do on the ice, not just their on and off times. Each 45-second shift has periods of gliding, repositioning, standing, etc. It’s rare that a player is skating nearly as hard as they can for the entire shift. As a result, the energy system profile changes fairly drastically toward a more alactic-aerobic stereotype.
  2. Lactic work is known to interfere with the development of speed, power, and strength. The off-season provides a small window to make improvements in specific physical capacities that will transfer to improved on-ice performance. In hockey, speed is often the top priority, and restoring strength is a close second. Spending too much time on lactic work will slow progress in these other areas. You can read more about this here: In-Season Training: Capacity Maintenance
  3. Making significant improvements in lactic capacity doesn’t take very long, and funneling a lot of lactic work into a two-week window creates a sufficient adaptation to help make the transfer into pre-season.
  4. Most players skate several times per week throughout the last half of the Summer, so they’re improving the local muscular endurance and lactic capacity to some degree for several weeks leading up through the end of the off-season already.

This is really just an introductory discussion into this topic. Gaining a better understanding of the specific energy system profiles of different roles within different positions and the genetic predispositions of specific players within those roles may be the single largest area for improvement within hockey training.

To your success,

Kevin Neeld
HockeyTransformation.com
OptimizingMovement.com
UltimateHockeyTraining.com

Please enter your first name and email below to sign up for my FREE Athletic Development and Hockey Training Newsletter!

Get Ultimate Hockey Transformation Now!

Year-round age-specific hockey training programs complete with a comprehensive instructional video database!

Ultimate Hockey Transformation Pro Package-small

Get access to your game-changing program now >> Ultimate Hockey Transformation

“Kevin Neeld is one of the top 5-6 strength and conditioning coaches in the ice hockey world.”
– Mike Boyle, Head S&C Coach, US Women’s Olympic Team

“…if you want to be the best, Kevin is the one you have to train with”
– Brijesh Patel, Head S&C Coach, Quinnipiac University

This seems to be the theme in the introductions of my writing this year, but the last few months have been a whirlwind.

As we were wrapping up another busy Summer, I left for two weeks to work at the pre-season camp for USA Hockey’s Women’s National Team, came home Sunday night, then we had pre-season testing/training Monday-Thursday of the next week for the Philadelphia Flyers Junior Team, and Friday mid-morning I left for my bachelor party weekend in the Poconos.

It was a fun stretch, until I came home to broken water heater and ~20 gallons of water spread throughout our laundry floor and my man cave!

ManCave

Cleaned up and open for business.

Around the middle of last week I finally got my head above water (pun intended), which brings me to the topic of today’s post.

PRI, CrossFit and Stability

Last Thursday a guy came into Endeavor to get assessed.

He was a former D1 lacrosse player that had transitioned his competitive spirit into CrossFit. He started to transition away from the lifts and into more body weight work after being diagnosed with degenerative disc disease, but was currently experiencing pain/discomfort in his left SI area, lateral hip, left hamstring, and patellar tendon on both sides, but it started and was worse on the left. This was in addition to his low back pain.

When I get emails from people that have pain, especially significant enough that they’ve pursued medical help, the overwhelming majority of the time I refer them out immediately to someone in my network. In this case, the pain was more “sub-clinical” and he specifically requested to go through a “functional assessment” to make sure he wasn’t doing anything that would cause him to get hurt in the future.

The new yearly check-up?

I really admire this attitude. That idea, of periodically getting your movement patterns checked, is something Shirley Sahrmann proposed over a decade ago as an opportunity for physical therapists to pre-emptively help a lot of people by performing yearly movement screens. If you think about it, we do this with our cars (certain things are checked with oils changes every 3,000 miles or so), and it’s common to go see a dentist every 6 months (or so I’m told…I’ve been to a dentist once in the last decade. The Neeld family tree doesn’t possess a lot of super powers, but our teeth are strong), but the importance of optimal movement is completely overlooked by post.

Unilateral pain patterns can have a lot of explanations, but the pattern he’s describing is one I see fairly commonly and can be appropriately addressed using an approach I learned from the Postural Restoration Institute. If you’re unfamiliar with PRI, you can read more about their philosophy, methodology, and education opportunities here: Postural Restoration Institute

The birds-eye view is that the overwhelming majority of human beings have common structural, and more importantly neurological asymmetries that interact with daily movement predispositions to cause predictable movement limitations and potentially pain patterns.

PRI Integration for Fitness and Movement

If you’re interested in learning more about PRI, we’re hosting their first ever PRI Integration for Fitness and Movement at Endeavor in Pitman, NJ October 17-18. As of this writing, there are 11 seats still open. I’m particularly excited about the event because there’s an incredible list of attendees already registered, so the discussions will be outstanding.

To be overly simplistic, his lower half was shifted and twisted right; his upper half was twisted left.

PRI Left AIC-Right BC-Front

This is a different client, but similar presentation. Note how his pelvis is looking to his right (your left), and how his thorax has counter-rotated back to the left. You can see this by looking at how his sternum lines up relative to his belly button and by seeing how much more stretched his left pec looks compared to his right.

Assessment Findings and Injury Patterns

A few notable findings from his assessment:

  1. Limited L Adduction
  2. Limited R Abduction
  3. Left Hip: External Rotation: 43-degrees; Internal Rotation: 27-degrees (70 total)
  4. Right Hip: External Rotation: 32-degrees; Internal Rotation: 34-degrees (66 total)
  5. Seated Thoracic Rotation: Left: ~50-degrees; Right: ~35-degrees
  6. Active Straight Leg Raise: Left: 1; Right: 3

I also had him perform several movements that he performs commonly in training. I took pictures on his phone (which I unfortunately don’t have access to), but a few things that jumped out right away:

  1. When squatting down, his hips appeared to be “looking” toward his right knee, not straight
  2. When pressing a bar overhead, his head was considerably closer to his right arm than his left (e.g. torso was shifted right, but rotated back to the left)
  3. When he did box jumps, he didn’t load his hips backwards, but dipped straight down (more like a jump shot pattern). He did this during the jump load, the landing on the box, and the landing on the ground when he jumped down.

One of the biggest challenges people have regarding PRI’s contention that all human beings are biased towards certain patterns and consequent limitations is that if everyone has the same limitations and not everyone has pain, then it’s a stretch to suggest that the limitation is causing the pain. There is A LOT that goes into whether the brain interprets something as painful, but from a pure mechanical perspective, it’s important to recognize that whether or not a limitation will result in an injury has a lot to do with the individual’s movement patterns and physical activity.

As an illustration, if your car has an alignment issue such that it pulls to the left, it may not cause any significant issues elsewhere throughout the car (e.g. wearing down one tire, or side of the axel) if you only use it once per week to drive down the road to get groceries. Simply, the demand placed on a subtle asymmetry isn’t enough to cause it to be symptomatic.

Similarly, if you only needed to drive the car in circles to the left, hypothetically, the alignment issue wouldn’t cause as many problems as it would if you only needed to drive circles toward the right. In fact, the alignment issue may make the car more economical in driving exclusively in left circles.

In contrast, if the alignment is off in your 24’ moving truck that you’re using to move across the country, the load of a packed cabin and the volume of movement required to transport from coast to coast will obviously lead to faster breakdowns.

This longwinded analogy is relevant here, because my client started experiencing symptoms while participating in CrossFit, an activity stereotyped by doing trying to do as much work as possible within a finite amount of time. If he played pick-up basketball with his friends once a month, his jumping pattern may have never caused anterior knee pain. But when he needs to, say, perform 100 box jumps as quickly as he can, he’s performing 300 reps (jump load, box landing, jumping off the box landing) in a poor pattern with altered alignment. You can’t always predict what will break down with improper movement, but you can feel pretty confident that SOMETHING will wear down. In this case, all of his discomfort was fairly predictable based on the positions he presented in and how they affected the movement patterns he performed most often.

Quick Fix?

In his case, I decided not to do any manual work. He was already doing some good soft-tissue work on his own with various implements (lacrosse balls, foam rollers, etc.) so I showed him one more that most people haven’t seen before:

[quicktime]http://www.kevinneeld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Lax-Ball-Posterior-Adductor-on-Box.mp4[/quicktime]

Read more about this here: 3 Rolling Exercises You Should Be Doing

And showed him how to do three exercises that took about 15 minutes to teach and perform: A 90-90 Hip Lift w/ Shift & 2-Arm Reach, a Left Side Lying R Glute Max, and a Paraspinal Release w/ Left Hamstring. The exercises were intended to “untwist” him, and teach his body a few stabilization strategies to hold the new “more neutral” position. When we retested him, he presented with:

  1. Full symmetrical adduction bilaterally
  2. Full symmetrical abduction bilaterally
  3. Left Hip: External Rotation: 40-degrees; Internal Rotation: 32-degrees (72 total)
  4. Right Hip: External Rotation: 42-degrees; Internal Rotation: 30-degrees (72 total)
  5. Active Straight Leg Raise: Left: 2; Right: 3

Not only did his hip motion improve, but it became more symmetrical. Of note, his Active Straight Leg Raise was limited, but the 2 was just under the 3 threshold, and the 3 was just over. In other words, they were inconsequentially different, and we improved his left motion by strengthening his left hamstring in a shortened position.

Most importantly, he said he felt better walking out the door AND during his workout later that day.

Naturally, time will tell if these remedial exercises are enough to teach his nervous system how to control his positions and movement more optimally, but the early results are encouraging.

Take Home

High training volumes are sometimes necessary to drive specific adaptations, but if you’re going to perform movements at a high volume you have to OWN them. Layering high volume on top of poor positions or movement patterns will increase the likelihood of a breakdown.

If you’re interested in joining us for PRI’s Integration for Fitness and Movement, you can register here: PRI Integration for Fitness and Movement

To your success,

Kevin Neeld
HockeyTransformation.com
OptimizingMovement.com
UltimateHockeyTraining.com

P.S. If you want to know how to apply this process in a small group or team setting, this is for you: Optimizing Movement

Please enter your first name and email below to sign up for my FREE Athletic Development and Hockey Training Newsletter!

Get Optimizing Movement Now!

“…one of the best DVDs I’ve ever watched”
“A must for anyone interested in coaching and performance!”

Optimizing Movement DVD Package

Click here for more information >> Optimizing Movement