Muscle Properties: Short vs. Stiff
When I gave my presentation “Innovative Practices in Strength and Conditioning” for SCWebinars.com, one of the topics that sparked the most interest among listeners was the idea of muscle shortness vs. stiffness.
A lot of athletes come to me complaining of feeling “tight” or “stiff”. These subject feelings can generally be broken down into acute or more “quasi-permanent” categories:
Acute: Following a training session, the resting “tone” of your muscles is increased. Simply, this means that your muscles have a greater level of resting tension and may feel tight or stiff. Unless you’re completely new to exercise, in which case your muscles will maintain a slightly elevated level of tone, this short-term increase in subjective “tightness” will generally subside within a day or two, especially if you do any dynamic or static stretching afterward or the next day.
“Quasi-Permanent”: I use the term “quasi-permanent” because just about any musculotendinous quality can be altered through training. With that understood, musculotendinous units (referred to as “muscle” from here on for simplicity) can be categorized as either “short” or “stiff”, both of which may feel tight.
In simple terms:
Short means the muscle simply doesn’t have the length. It can be extended to a point, beyond which it will begin to tear.
Stiff means the muscle has more length, it just takes more force to move it.
When I was trying to remember the difference, I thought of the people I knew that had a hard time doing full range of motion body weight squats, but could drop all the way down with ease with a loaded bar on their back. The extra force made it easier for them to achieve full range of motion (a stiffness issue).
Another example: If you’re stretching someone’s hamstrings, you’d bring them up to a point where you feel them start to resist. This can be thought of as an “end point”. If you push harder and the leg simply doesn’t move, it’s probably short. If you push a little harder and the leg moves a little further, it’s probably stiff.
It’s important to remember that all muscles have length (short vs. long) and stiffness (amount of force needed to take it through it’s full range of motion) qualities. The above examples are just meant to help you visualize the difference.
Understanding the difference between length and stiffness is of paramount importance when training athletes, as these muscle properties can have huge performance implications regarding power, speed, and quickness.
The question is: Is stiffness a bad thing?
The answer is: You’ll have to wait till Wednesday :-)
To your success,
Kevin Neeld
Similar Posts:
- Performance Implications of Muscultendinous Stiffness
- Should You Stretch After You Pull A Muscle?
- Dissecting Muscle Function: Influence
- Stretching for Hockey
- Words of Wisdom from David Lasnier
Looking forward to part 2!
Btw Coach Kevin, as someone who read a lot i would say you have a uniqueness in your writing that i find particularly enjoyable and specific to you.
As evident above, you break it down into “simple terms”. For the astute, that alone can be profound enough!
Keep up the good work my friend!
27.04.2010, 2:33 pm[...] Muscle Properties: Short vs. Stiff [...]
28.04.2010, 6:11 amThanks for the kind words Sam. I do my best to make things as simple as I can. Sometimes it comes out better than others.
04.05.2010, 11:21 am[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kevin Neeld. Kevin Neeld said: Muscle Properties | Muscle Stiffness | SCWebinars | KevinNeeld.com http://www.kevinneeld.com/2010/muscle-properties-short-vs-stiff [...]
04.05.2010, 11:51 am